The aftermath of Celtic’s League Cup final victory has taken a contentious turn, with Rangers formally contacting the Scottish Football Association (SFA) to demand an explanation over a controversial penalty decision during their 4-2 shootout defeat on Sunday.
Rangers Chief Executive Patrick Stewart, seemingly influenced by media and fan uproar, has reportedly raised the issue with the governing body, stating the club is owed clarity on why a second-half penalty appeal was dismissed.
According to STV News, the complaint centres on what Rangers believe was a penalty-worthy incident in the box.
Rather than addressing their team’s deficiencies, Rangers have doubled down on the narrative that officiating robbed them of the trophy—a stance that overlooks Celtic’s dominance on the day.
The controversy stems from a clash in the penalty area during the second half. Rangers argued the incident warranted a penalty, but referee John Beaton waved play on. VAR, after reviewing the footage, chose not to overrule the initial decision, instead awarding a free-kick.
Despite this, Rangers seem intent on framing the moment as pivotal to the outcome, ignoring their own shortcomings. Celtic’s superior discipline and composure, particularly in the decisive shootout, were undeniably key to their success.
This isn’t the first time Rangers have sought answers from the SFA following a high-stakes defeat.
The club’s tendency to challenge refereeing decisions, rather than confronting on-field issues, has become a recurring theme.
Critics argue such actions are more about placating an agitated fanbase than pursuing meaningful reform in the game.
While Rangers spiral into another self-imposed controversy, Celtic continue to focus on their ambitions.
With their 119th major honour secured, the Hoops solidify their place as Scotland’s most decorated club, showing an unflinching resolve in the face of external distractions.
As Brendan Rodgers’ side presses forward, they’ll undoubtedly relish the opportunity to maintain pressure on their rivals—both on the pitch and in the court of public opinion.
